Exploring the paradox of why colossal, outlandish lies can often be easier to believe than small ones.

By Tanvi Mishra and Nicholas Jaramillo
01/27/2021 • 05:06 AM EST


Trump tells his supporters that the 2020 presidential election was stolen.

On January 6th, 2021, on a 52-acre park just south of the White House, President Donald Trump delivered a speech at the “Save America Rally” to a crowd of supporters,[1] where he declared the 2020 presidential election had been rigged and that he'd won by a landslide.[2] An hour after the rally ended, the crowd of thousands walked up Pennsylvania Ave, forced their way through police lines and stormed the U.S. Capitol.[1]

Despite the hollowness and magnitude of the false claim[3], a bald-faced colossal lie can actually be more believable than a small one because it can be harder to believe someone would fabricate it if there weren't at least some truth to it. And even when those same people are presented with the most indisputable of facts, once they hear the big liesee definition - telling and repeating a lie so bold and audacious that people will be inclined to think there must be some truth to it.
, it can be difficult to dislodge.

Hannah Arendt, the famed political theorist and Holocaust survivor, asserts that even after someone realizes a piece of information is a lie, the permanent effect of being unable to believe much else sets in, as if the lie takes up mental real estate that must first be vacated before the truth can take root.[4]

The big lie can also make small, supporting lies seem more plausible. These smaller lies help reinforce the credibility of the big lie and create a channel of facile manipulation that is hard to reverse. In the words of Zachary J. Jacobson, "Like a pyramid, the big lie organized a configuration of smaller lies underneath... Swallow the big pill, and the rest would follow."[5]

Just as significant as the boldness of the lie is the charisma of the peddler. In the realm of human psychology, a person’s susceptibility to lies through emotional appeal is termed the affect heuristicsee definition - a mental shortcut in which people make decisions that are heavily influenced by their current emotions, rather than through logical reasoning or deliberation.
. The alluring and sensationalist nature of fiction promotes a strong emotional response which severely hinders our ability to think rationally.[6] In other words, intense emotions are equated to genuineness; the more emotional intensity present, the more we are inclined to think it must be true.[7]

In the end, it doesn’t matter whether the purveyors of the big lie believe it or not. As the events of January 6th 2021 demonstrated, if those delivering the lie appear to believe it and continue to deliver it with enough conviction, some people will always believe it.

References
1. "How a Presidential Rally Turned Into a Capitol Rampage". The New York Times. Published: January 12, 2021.

2. "Donald Trump Speech "Save America"". Rev.com. Published: January 06, 2021.

3. "AP FACT CHECK: Trump's claims of vote rigging are all wrong". AP News. Published: December 03, 2020.

4. Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism. World Publishing Company. Published: 1962.
6. "The American Abyss". The New York Times. Published: January 09, 2021.

7. B.E. Turvey, J.O. Savino, A. Coronado Mares, False Allegations: Investigative and Forensic Issues in Fraudulent Reports of Crime. Academic Press. Published: 2018.