Don't know how to use this page?
- the definition will be displayed here. - insisting something is true because an expert on the issue says it's true, when that expert has a vested interest in the outcome. - a statement that is essentially true, but lacking critical information and presented as the whole truth. - a statement with a few elements or kernel of truth, which can easily be proven deceptive or fundamentally untrue. - a statement that is directly contradicted by fact and can be easily proven untrue. - a question that is difficult to answer in an ambiguous manner without appearing to be evading or dodging. - replacing neutral language with more derogatory or unpleasant terms, to instill a negative association. - a statement that is directly contradicted by fact and can be easily proven untrue. - presenting only evidence that confirms your position, while ignoring or withholding an often more significant portion that contradicts it. - implying that two things are essentially the same, when they only have anecdotal similarities. - discrediting a criticism by accusing hypocrisy, in order to shift the focus away from oneself and onto others. - a question that is difficult to answer in an ambiguous manner without appearing to be evading or dodging. - discrediting a criticism by accusing hypocrisy, in order to shift the focus away from oneself and onto others. - using an opponent's links to another person or group to assign the other's beliefs, misdeeds, or other unattractive traits to the opponent. - using an opponent's links to another person or group to assign the other's beliefs, misdeeds, or other unattractive traits to the opponent. - Defending or championing cultural sacred cows in order to transfer the respect, authority, and prestige associated with those symbols onto oneself. - Defending or championing cultural sacred cows in order to transfer the respect, authority, and prestige associated with those symbols onto oneself. - replacing neutral language with more derogatory or unpleasant terms, to instill a negative association. - presenting only evidence that confirms your position, while ignoring or withholding an often more significant portion that contradicts it. - a question that is difficult to answer in an ambiguous manner without appearing to be evading or dodging. - an extravagant statement or figure of speech used for effect, not intended to be taken literally. - presenting only evidence that confirms your position, while ignoring or withholding an often more significant portion that contradicts it. - a question that is difficult to answer in an ambiguous manner without appearing to be evading or dodging. - shifting blame onto someone else for self-exoneration or to direct attention away from those really at fault. - response that doesn't follow logically from or isn't related to anything previously asked or said. - using the words "weak" or "weakness" to instill negative emotions when associated with an opponent or group. - a brief, striking phrase that people will remember, typically designed to evoke emotional appeals and reinforce a specific message or idea. - an extravagant statement or figure of speech used for effect, not intended to be taken literally.Total number of techniques detected over the 53:19 runtime of this video clip:
PROPAGANDA TECHNIQUES
10 OCCURRENCES
dysphemism:
FALSEHOODS & DISTORTIONS
8 OCCURRENCES
appeal to compromised authority: SUMMARY
18 OCCURRENCES
Gillum: 50% DeSantis: 50%
