: Click or tap on any technique - the definition will be displayed here. that appears in bold to show its definition.
: false claim - a statement that is directly contradicted by fact and can be easily proven untrue. : The Mueller Report concluded neither that there was no obstruction or no collusion.[1][2]
: cherry picking - presenting only evidence that confirms your position, while ignoring or withholding an often more significant portion that contradicts it. : Jordan lists only the cost and labor-related aspects of the Mueller investigation, while ignoring its findings.
: false claim - a statement that is directly contradicted by fact and can be easily proven untrue. : Trump did want to fire Bob Mueller and that appears to be what happened.[3]
: false claim - a statement that is directly contradicted by fact and can be easily proven untrue. : The Steele dossier was not the origin of the Mueller investigation. George Papadopoulos's contact with Russian intermediaries was.[4]
: false claim - a statement that is directly contradicted by fact and can be easily proven untrue. : Cavuto just cited a poll that said "close to half" of Americans say enough already, which is not "everybody."
: the American people - (a form of bandwagon) promoting a position as having the overwhelming support of all Americans, while providing no evidence that it does.
: half truth - a statement that is essentially true, but lacking critical information and presented as the whole truth. : Jordan mentions Mueller "chose" not to indict, without mentioning there's a DOJ policy preventing Mueller from indicting a sitting president.[5]
: false claim - a statement that is directly contradicted by fact and can be easily proven untrue. : Cavuto's poll said "close to half" of Americans want to move on, which is not most.
: dysphemism - replacing or augmenting otherwise accurate or neutral language with more derogatory or unappealing terms to instill a negative association. : The term "spying" characterizes a standard investigatory action as covert and unethical, instead of using a neutral term like "conducting surveillance." more...
: whataboutism - discrediting a criticism by accusing hypocrisy to shift the focus away from oneself and onto others. : Meadows shifts the focus from concerns about Trump’s conduct to past controversies involving Clinton and then Schiff—diverting attention away from Trump's actions. more...
: half truth - a statement that is essentially true, but lacking critical information and presented as the whole truth. : Meadows mentions that Mueller didn't indict Trump, without mentioning there's a DOJ policy preventing Mueller from indicting a sitting president.[5]
: misleading claim - a statement with a few elements or kernel of truth, which can easily be proven deceptive or fundamentally untrue. : It may also have been DOJ policy, not a lack of proof, that prevented Mueller bringing charges.[5]
: whataboutism - discrediting a criticism by accusing hypocrisy to shift the focus away from oneself and onto others. : Meadows shifts the focus from whether Trump associates did enough to raise alarms about Russian interference in the 2016 election to accusing Obama of the same—diverting criticism onto the prior administration. more...
: fault as virtue - portraying a weakness or undesirable trait as a strength by highlighting any positive aspect of it. : Jordan suggests the repeated Russian baiting of Trump associates—which could be viewed as a sign they were corruptible—instead is a reassuring sign of the campaign's integrity. more...
Number of techniques detected in the
12:29
video runtime:
PROPAGANDA TECHNIQUES
5 OCCURRENCES
cherry picking: dysphemism: fault as virtue: whataboutism: