Don't know how to use this page?
- the definition will be displayed here. - a statement with a few elements or kernel of truth, which can easily be proven deceptive or fundamentally untrue. - attacking the character or motive of the person making an argument, rather than attacking the argument itself. - using an opponent's links to another to assign the other's beliefs, misdeeds, or other unattractive qualities to the opponent. - a statement that is essentially true, but lacking critical information and presented as the whole truth. - stretching the truth to make something seem more powerful or meaningful than it actually is. - pigeon-holing a person or group into a simple category and assigning names and/or beliefs to that category. - implying something without actually saying it, which can't be refuted because it wasn't actually said. - a brief, striking phrase that people will remember, which typically acts on emotional appeals. - stretching the truth to make something seem more powerful or meaningful than it actually is. - a statement with a few elements or kernel of truth, which can easily be proven deceptive or fundamentally untrue. - a bold statement that is presented as accepted or established fact, with no discernable evidence to support the claim. - discrediting a criticism by accusing hypocrisy, in order to shift the focus away from oneself and onto others. - stretching the truth to make something seem more powerful or meaningful than it actually is. - a bold statement that is presented as accepted or established fact, with no discernable evidence to support the claim. - characterizing criticism from an opponent as being underhanded, unfair, or indecent in some way. - stretching the truth to make something seem more powerful or meaningful than it actually is. - proclaiming that because something occurred after X, it was caused by X, when no causal relationship at all may exist. - a statement with a few elements or kernel of truth, which can easily be proven deceptive or fundamentally untrue. - discrediting a criticism by accusing hypocrisy, in order to shift the focus away from oneself and onto others. - presenting only evidence that confirms your position, while ignoring or withholding an often more significant portion that contradicts it. - a statement with a few elements or kernel of truth, which can easily be proven deceptive or fundamentally untrue. - throwing an irrelevant fact into an argument to divert attention from the real issue at hand. - a question that is difficult to answer in an ambiguous manner without appearing to be evading or dodging. - a statement that is directly contradicted by fact and can be easily proven untrue. - a statement that is directly contradicted by fact and can be easily proven untrue. - making nonspecific threats of consequences to intimidate an adversary and/or impress an audience. - a statement that is directly contradicted by fact and can be easily proven untrue. - using an opponent's links to another to assign the other's beliefs, misdeeds, or other unattractive qualities to the opponent. - misrepresenting an opponent's position or argument to make it easier to attack, usually by exaggerating, distorting, or just completely fabricating it. - stretching the truth to make something seem more powerful or meaningful than it actually is. - a bold statement that is presented as accepted or established fact, with no discernable evidence to support the claim. - establishing a connection with an audience based on being just like one of them and being able to empathize with their concerns. - removing a passage or quote from its surrounding context in such a way as to distort its intended meaning.Total number of techniques detected over the 1:48:57 runtime of this video clip:
PROPAGANDA TECHNIQUES
9 OCCURRENCES
ad hominem:
FALSEHOODS & DISTORTIONS
20 OCCURRENCES
baseless claim: 
SUMMARY
29 OCCURRENCES
Warren: 29% Bloomberg: 23% Sanders: 23% Biden: 13% Buttigieg: 10% Klobuchar: 3%
