Don't know how to use this page?
- the definition will be displayed here. - a statement with a few elements or kernel of truth, which can easily be proven deceptive or fundamentally untrue. - making broad generalizations based on individual stories or isolated examples that support that generalization. - asserting a claim is true because it is supported by an authority whose expertise, independence, or identity is unreliable or unverifiable. - implying that two things are essentially the same, despite being significantly different, by focusing on anecdotal or superficial similarities. - giving the impression that only two opposing options exist while ignoring the possibility of any middle ground or nuanced alternatives. - diverting attention from the real causes of an issue by assigning blame to a vulnerable or convenient target. - making broad generalizations based on individual stories or isolated examples that support that generalization. - implying something negative or controversial without explicitly stating it, leaving the audience to infer the intended meaning. - proclaiming that because something occurred after X, it was caused by X, when no causal relationship at all may exist. - reducing uncertainty to certainty by treating the absence of evidence as evidence itself. - portraying oneself as a victim to elicit sympathy, deflect criticism, and foster a sense of shared vulnerability with the audience. - discrediting an opponent by linking them with a person, group, or entity viewed negatively by the target audience. - giving the impression that only two opposing options exist while ignoring the possibility of any middle ground or nuanced alternatives. - asserting a claim is true because it is supported by an authority whose expertise, independence, or identity is unreliable or unverifiable. - connecting with an audience by giving the impression that you understand and share their everyday struggles and concerns. - a statement that is essentially true, but lacking critical information and presented as the whole truth. - accusing an opponent of using the same underhanded tactics or committing the same misdeeds the accuser is guilty of. - accusing an opponent of using the same underhanded tactics or committing the same misdeeds the accuser is guilty of. - a statement that is directly contradicted by fact and can be easily proven untrue. - reducing uncertainty to certainty by treating the absence of evidence as evidence itself. - discrediting a criticism by accusing hypocrisy to shift the focus away from oneself and onto others. - misrepresenting an opponent's position or argument to make it easier to attack, usually by exaggerating, distorting, or just completely fabricating it. - using emotionally appealing words that align with the target audience's value system to elicit approval or support.Number of techniques detected in the 1:43:42 video runtime:
PROPAGANDA TECHNIQUES
19 OCCURRENCES
appeal to authority:
DISINFORMATION TACTICS
4 OCCURRENCES
false claim: SUMMARY
23 OCCURRENCES
Trump83%Biden17%
