Don't know how to use this page?
- the definition will be displayed here. - making dire warnings or raising doubt about an issue, while provided little or no specifics or evidence to support the claims. - a brief, striking phrase that people will remember, which typically acts on emotional appeals. - a brief, striking phrase that people will remember, which typically acts on emotional appeals. - discrediting a criticism by accusing hypocrisy, in order to shift the focus away from oneself and onto others. - discrediting a criticism by accusing hypocrisy, in order to shift the focus away from oneself and onto others. - a brief, striking phrase that people will remember, which typically acts on emotional appeals. - characterizing criticism from an opponent as being underhanded, unfair, or indecent in some way. - technique where a weakness is presented as a strength, by focusing on any positive aspect of it. - throwing an irrelevant fact into an argument to divert attention from the real issue at hand. - insisting something is true because an expert on the issue says it's true, when that expert has a vested interest in the outcome. - accusing an opponent of using the same underhanded tactics or committing the same misdeeds the accuser is guilty of. - characterizing criticism from an opponent as being underhanded, unfair, or indecent in some way. - raising doubt by suggesting something is true because it has not yet been proven false. - accusing an opponent of using the same underhanded tactics or committing the same misdeeds the accuser is guilty of. - portraying oneself as a victim in order to gain sympathy and manufacture justification for attacking your opponents. - discrediting a criticism by accusing hypocrisy, in order to shift the focus away from oneself and onto others. - insisting something is true because an expert on the issue says it's true, when that expert has a vested interest in the outcome. - making dire warnings or raising doubt about an issue, while provided little or no specifics or evidence to support the claims. - implying that two things are essentially the same, when they only have anecdotal similarities. - discrediting a criticism by accusing hypocrisy, in order to shift the focus away from oneself and onto others. - replacing accurate language that may be offensive with language that is more palatable, to instill a positive association. - pigeon-holing a person or group into a simple category and assigning names and/or beliefs to that category. - implying something without actually saying it, which can't be refuted because it wasn't actually said.Cumulative total of the techniques detected over the 1:45:39 runtime of this video clip:
PROPAGANDA TECHNIQUES
18 OCCURRENCES
appeal to ignorance:
FALSEHOODS & DISTORTIONS
2 OCCURRENCES
appeal to compromised authority: SUMMARY
24 OCCURRENCES
Clinton: 92% Sanders: 8%
